Monday, December 8, 2008

"Happy Go Lucky"


(Warning: some minor spoilers in this post)

Poppy Cross, the heroine of "Happy Go Lucky," is more than a beautifully realized, infinitely complex character (although she certainly is that) she also proves to be a sort of Rorschach test for the viewer. What you see in her, how you react to her, is likely reveal to your deepest feelings about how good or bad the world is, and how much any of us can do to change it. It's not just that watching Poppy in action forces you to identify whether you're a glass-half-full or a glass-half -empty person; it goes deeper than that. She forces you to think through your entire worldview.

I don't know if writer-director Mike Leigh and actress Sally Hawkins had such lofty goals in mind when they collaborated on creating Poppy, but this much is sure: "Happy Go Lucky" is a deceptively lightweight and freewheeling film that actually touches on profound truths about our capacities for happiness and overcoming personal loss and pain.

Allow me to lay bare my own "Rorschach results" with regard to Poppy. Most reviewers have pegged her as being a genuinely happy person; I'd like to suggest that she isn't necessarily all that happy (and I'll provide evidence for that observation later). And while her perpetual cheerfulness and optimism are ultimately shown to be lasting and positive qualities, I'd also like to suggest that Poppy harbors more than a smidgen of youthful arrogance and naivete about her ability to change people's lives with a smile and joke, and that her interactions with the other characters in "Happy Go Lucky" force her to face the ultimate impossibility of injecting her rose-tinted worldview into the brains of the suffering people around her.

When we first encounter Poppy, she's riding her bike on a beautiful, sunny day. She stops at a book store, where she encounters an unsmiling, preoccupied sales clerk whom she makes it her mission to engage and amuse. There's a relentlessness and a desperation in her need to bring brightness into his day. At one low point, she resorts to telling him "I like your hat." The compliment gets no response. It's not a promising beginning. You may well groan inwardly at the prospect of spening two more hours in the company of this character.

But in the following scenes, we see Poppy out clubbing with her friends, then stumbling back with them to her flat where the night ends in gales of jokes and laughter. It's a well-calibrated transition, allowing us not only to see Poppy's penchant for zaniness in a far less annoying context, but also to sense some of her inherent warmth and nurturing qualities. Subsequent scenes of Poppy - teaching elementary school, hanging out with her flatmate, visiting a chiropractor for a back injury (which she exclaims "hurts so bad, it makes me laugh!"), going to flamenco dance classes with a co-worker -allow the full picture of Poppy to emerge. Her inherent goodness and openness shine through, but so does her irritating goofiness. Her compulsion to laugh, joke and entertain everyone around her (witness her exaggerated, "aren't we having a laugh?" facial expressions in the flamenco class) seem calculated to cajole her friends out of bad moods and to call attention to herself in equal measures.

And therein lies the central paradox of Poppy. Her good intentions are everywhere apparent, even in quiet scenes where she does no more than bring a mug of tea to her hungover flatmate or just enjoys chatting with a fellow teacher. Her life feels full, enjoyable and well-lived. But the compulsive comedy routine she lapses into when confronted with anyone else's bad mood seems to spring from as much from her own unmet needs for attention as from a genuine concern for them. And it suggests that, while she truly wants the people around her to be happy, she may not be doing the best job of carving out a deeper happiness for herself.

Nowhere is this more true than in the story thread where Poppy takes driving instructions from a gloomy, foul-tempered teacher, Scott, (played by Eddie Marsan who is every bit Hawkins' equal in brilliance here). His bitterness and just barely contained rage present a challenge to Poppy. She's a non-stop jokester, always trying to cajole him out of his bad moods. But as the lessons proceed, the mood in that training car grows darker. Scott is an angry racist with deep, long-simmering emotional wounds, but he occasionally makes very reasonable requests of Poppy, which she laughs off in an irritating way. (Like repeatedly defying his request that she wear flat shoes for driving - she instead shows up again and again in cute, high-heeled boots that she suggests have been previously worn for at least one evening of sexual escapades.)

Their final ride together is heart-stopping, and it culminates in Poppy's sobering realization of Scott's pain and potential for violence. Both Hawkins and Marsan are astounding in this scene; Marsan quivers with inexpressible anguish while Hawkins wordlessly conveys both Poppy's sadness for Scott and her own pain at seeing how her relentless buoyancy is perceived by someone who is truly and deeply unhappy.

Poppy's other brush with darkness is even more unsettling. Wandering home one night, she hears some incoherent phrase being repeatedly sung from someone under a bridge, and she seeks it out. The voice belongs to a mentally ill, homeless man (Stanley Townsend), who Poppy bravely goes on to engage in conversation. Townsend invests his character with a dangerous edge, and the scene is profoundly uncomfortable. It also feels a little contrived -what the hell is Poppy doing wandering around this dodgy neighborhood anyway? - as if Leigh included it to forestall any criticism that Poppy's optimism wouldn't stand up in the face of real trouble. Poppy's curiosity and need to connect with this man feel less admirable than forced and foolhardy; at one point, she asks herself "What am I doing here?" and I, frankly, had the same reaction.

Leigh fills the film with his trademark, slice-of-life scenes, and gives his actors room and time to explore and inhabit their characters. The interesting result is that some of the greatest keys to the characters' nature end up being contained in tossed-off bits of dialogue and throwaway bits of business that aren't highlighted dramatically (and feel all the more real for it).

For example, this early exchange between Poppy and Scott.
POPPY (to Scott): Are you Satan?
SCOTT: No, quite the opposite.
POPPY: Are you the Pope then?
SCOTT: No, that's the same thing.

Scott's equation of the Pope with Satan indicates some fundamentalist religious beliefs that aren't really explored, but may be of a piece with his racist rants later on.

Or take the subtle shift in Poppy's attire just prior to the final scenes. Throughout the film, her clothing has been careless, mismatched, and attention-grabbing all at once. Her wardrobe tends towards bright primary colors, and her outfits are inevitably accessorized with brightly-hued lacy tights, armfuls of bangle bracelets, and her ever-present boots.

Late in the film, however, Poppy makes a romantic connection with Tim, the social worker she's engaged to help a troubled student (Samuel Roukin). Tim clearly adores her, and after they spend a night together, Poppy changes into a subdued pair of jeans and jacket. Her flatmate remarks on the fact that she's not wearing jewelry, and Poppy replies that "It's that kind of day." It's as if, now that she's allowed herself to be truly seen and admired, she no longer needs to draw so much attention to herself.

Don't be fooled by these observations - there's no conventional dramatic arc in "Happy Go Lucky," and in the end, it isn't entirely clear to what degree Poppy's experiences have changed her. You may also find it odd that I haven't made many direct references to Sally Hawkins' performance, but do I really need to? Any actress who who creates a character so fascinating, frustrating and memorable as to engender this much discussion has more than done her job. Whether you like Poppy or dislike her isn't really the point. it's how real and fully imagined she is that matters. On that count, I'm not sure how anyone could find "Happy Go Lucky" wanting.

13 comments:

Jonathan Lapper said...

Pat, I'm glad you liked it. I think you're right about Poppy, as I had my suspicions about her happiness as well. When I watch it again I'll have to look for the dress changes. I remember the jewelry line but don't think I noticed the more subdued clothing as you did.

I did find her date conversation a bit awkward, as if she was afraid to just have a real conversation. All we see of her and her new boyfriend involves jokes made to each other. One wonders whether it will ever go any deeper or will he become bored with her never speaking outside of giggles and move on.

Pat said...

Jonathan -

Good observation about the date. Poppy does have that tendency to fall back on her jokes in most social situations. And she's still doing it in the last scene of the film - I like the ambiguity withr regard to the lasting effect that the experience with Scott will have on her.

T.S. said...

Pat - Great review! I can't wait to see this. My movie-going habits this year haven't been great at all, but this one is definitely on my to-see list.

Also, a quick note ... I wanted to say thanks for leaving some kind words over on Screen Savour. (I've been behind in reading my comments!) I was so surprised to come across your blog, particularly because I also worked for the Indiana Daily Student! :O It was after you were there, but that's very coincidental indeed. Anyway, you've picked up a new reader. Looking forward to more.

Daniel Getahun said...

I had the same thoughts as Jonathan about the date, and about her happiness in general. I often myself thinking that about people, actually. Like sometimes they're trying to convince themselves they're happier than they really are or something.

The point is, just because someone's smiling, it doesn't mean they're truly happy. (Like I have all the answers...)

Pat said...

TS-

Thanks for "stopping by." I do recall that you were a fellow IU grad -quite a coincidence that you wrote for the IDS as well.(Of course, I worked there back when dinosaurs still roamed the earth! :O) Were on the Arts desk?
My first editor at the IDS was Matt Roush,who's now the head writer at TV Guide.

Pat said...

***SPOILER WARNING!***

Daniel -
Your comment and Jonathan's got me thinking - perhaps it's significant that at the end of the film, Poppy is alone in that rowboat with her flatmate. After all, the flatmate is about the only person with whom we see her have a relationship of any real depth. Maybe the two of them just go on renting flats together and taking care of each other. Just a stray thought...

In an interview with Salon, Leigh described Poppy as "not actually neurotic at all. She's very together, very focused, and very open and honest, truthful with herself and everyone else, but she has a great sense of humor, and the capacity to be zany when she wants to be zany." He's the director so far be it from me to argue with him. But I think the fact that many of us don't see her quite that way probably reflects what we bring to "Happy Go Lucky," hence my Rorshach test analogy.

Daniel Getahun said...

Well she was alone - but didn't she still have the thing going on with Tim? Maybe my memory is fuzzy, but I thought she had just finished talking to him on the phone - as if they were now a couple.

But if not - then your stray thought is probably true.

It's an interesting ending to the film...

Pat said...

No, Daniel you are correct. She still had a connection to Tim. Somehow I was looking at that last scene as a forshadowing of her ultimate situation, but, in retrospect, I'm sure I was reading too much into it. (Sometimes I get a little carried away!) I don't think Mike Leigh works like that.

Fox said...

Hey Pat-

I like your take. Like, I think, everyone else's take on Poppy, I see her a bit differently. For instance, I didn't sense desperation in her when she was in the bookstore. Overall, I kind of see her as a figment, or a caricature. But I mean that in a very positive way.

But I don't mean to challenge your thoughts or anyone elses b/c I think everybody's are pretty sound. What I find so cool is that this character has had an impact (for positive or not) on so many people I know, and it's been a pleasure to see the responses. I bet Mike Leigh loves that too.

Pat said...

Fox - I think you're hitting on exactly what is so special about "Happy Go Lucky." The character of Poppy is so real, so fully imagined and so multi-faceted, that she just gets under your skin. I couldn't stop thinking about her, even two days after I saw the film - and even though I wasn't totally crazy about her. That's a real testament to the fine work of both Mike Leigh and Sally Hawkins.

Fletch said...

Your last paragraph summed up my issues with the movie. Good acting (and even fleshed-out characters) does not a good movie make alone. I'd rather watch the ultimate arcless movie (Linklater's Slacker) than the plotless film showcased here. At least that one was interesting and inventive.

Pat said...

Fletch -

Over the last year, I've come to apprectiate more and more the films that don't have a traditional dramatic arc. But they're not everyone's cup of tea.
I think we both agree that Eddie Marsan was fantastic in this film.

wytchcroft said...

great film and a smart review!